INDIA THAT IS BHARATH
Article 1 (1) of Indian Constitution
declares that the liberated British India is a Union of States which is ‘India,
that is Bharat.’ This is the only
provision in the Constitution on how this country be called for official and
unofficial purposes. Though there were
many suggestions to call the country as Bharat, Hindustan, Hind, Bharatbhumi, Bharatvarsh
etc., the Constituent Assembly on 18-09-1949 resolved as follows: “Article 1.
Name and territory of the Union. 1.1 India, that is Bharat, shall be a union of
states.”
Dr. Rajendra Prasad, who was presiding the Constituent
Assembly on 24th
January
1950, made the following statement which was also adopted as the final decision
on the issue
of National Song and National Anthem: “The composition consisting of words and music
known as Jana Gana Mana
is the National Anthem of India, subject to such alterations as the Government
may authorise as occasion arises, and the song Vande Mataram, which has played a historic part in the
struggle for Indian freedom, shall be honoured equally with Jana Gana Mana
and shall have equal status with it.”
The objections raised even during Freedom
Struggle by the Muslim Leaders in regard to National Song were duly addressed
by the then Congress forming a committee and after India’s Independence, Vande Mataram Song
was adopted as national song by the Constituent Assembly which should have been
taken as a permanent solution.
But, the issue was raked up quite often by the Muslim Brethren with
the same old settled objections – viz. national song is un-islamic and
non-secular in content with the prominent Hindu religious sentiments and with
obeisance to Goddess Durga
and the plot of Anandamath the
novel written by Bankim
Chandra Chattopadhyay in which the song was originally written had an anti-muslim
plot. Though the song was written as a counter move, when the British Raj was
trying to promote “God Save the Queen” as the anthem for Indian subjects which
Indian nationalists and Freedom Fighters disliked. Chattopadhyay wrote the poem in a spontaneous session using
words for the first two stanzas in
Sanskrit and the rest in Bengali and the Sanskrit two stanzas were
approved as National Song .
It is also a historic fact that
Tagore was against adopting Vande Mataram
as national song and he opined: “The core of Vande Mataram
is a hymn to goddess Durga: this is so plain that there can
be no debate about it. Of course Bankim
Chandra does show Durga to be inseparably united with
Bengal in the end, but no Muslim can be expected patriotically to worship the
ten-handed deity as the nation. ..The novel Anandamath
is a work of literature and so the song is appropriate in it. But Parliament is
a place of union for all religious groups, and there the song cannot be
appropriate. When Bengal Muslims show signs of stubborn fanaticism, we regard
these as intolerable. When we too copy them and make unreasonable demands, it
will be self-defeating.”
But the opinions of Gandhiji
and Nehru were in favour of choosing Vande
Mataram
as our national song.
Gandhi’s views are found in an
article in Harijan
dated July 1, 1939:
“No matter
what its source was and how and when it was composed, it had become a most
powerful battle cry among Hindus and Musalmans of Bengal during the partition days. It
was an anti-imperialist cry. As a lad, when I knew nothing of Anandamath or
even Bankim, its
immortal author, Vande Mataram had gripped
me, and when I first heard it sung it had enthralled me. I associated the
purest national spirit with it. It never occurred to me that it was a Hindu
song or meant only for Hindus… It stirs to its depth the patriotism of millions
in and outside Bengal. Its chosen stanzas are Bengal’s gift among many others
to the whole nation.”
Nehru’s statement made
to the legislative committee of the Constituent Assembly on August 25, 1948
was also in favour of Vande Mataram as
national song: ''It
is unfortunate that some kind of argument has arisen as between Vande Mataram and
Jana Gana
Mana. Vande Mataram is
obviously and indisputably the premier national song of India, with a great
historical tradition, and intimately connected with our struggle for freedom.
That position it is bound to retain and no other song can displace it. It
represents the position and poignancy of that struggle, but perhaps not so much
the culmination of it. In regard to the national anthem tune, it was felt that
the tune was more important than the words... It seemed therefore that while Vande Mataram
should continue to be the national song par excellence in India, the national
anthem tune should be that of Jana Gana Mana, the wording of Jana Gana Mana
to be suitably altered to fit in with the existing circumstances.”
Even on such settled issue after due
deliberations, considerations, debates and discussions, some Muslim elected
representatives were raking up the subject and openly defid in
accepting the two stanzas of Vande Mataram as National Song and said “Even if you
put a sword on our throat, we will not sing that song!”.
British Government, while granting
Freedom, had divided India into two parts – India and Pakistan in the year 1947
and while India was declared as a secular state, Pakistan had preferred to be a
religious state and hence it had chosen to be an Islamic
State. India had given equal opportunities to all religious sects without any
discrimination – rather India was magnanimous
in giving special privileges to Muslims as a minority religious
community. Many Muslims preferred to
remain in India, while most of the Hindus in Pakistan territory had crossed
over to India during the horrible and ill planned partition of the British
India.
Unfortunately some
fundamentalists Muslims in India are not
ready to accept the fact that their religious concepts should be their private
affairs and that their loyalties to India should be primary and absolute and
the laws of the land need to be obeyed. The outlook of ‘India First and
Everything Next ‘ should be embedded in the minds of all Indian Citizens
irrespective of their varying religious beliefs.
Muslims are still against
Common Civil Law being implemented in India which is a secular state where
there should be no credence or preference to be given on the basis of religious
beliefs. But, any such reforms are
labelled as imposition by Hindu majorities on Muslim minorities and India is
struck without the courage to reform laws to give equal justice to all
irrespective of religions – thus India could not become a true secular state in
letter and spirit due to Indian Muslims prepared to subscribe to their
religious rather than secular concepts
In this context, new discussions and narrow definitions on
Patriotism, Nationalism, Sedition,
Blasphemy ,
Intolerance are being brought to the forefront as if to give a view that India
is moving towards the Hindu’s thoughts and Hindu religious beliefs threatening
the secular fabric as guaranteed by the constitution. And after India having
elected Modi as its Prime Minister in May 2014 with a clear mandate, the voices
of violent protests by some activists and communes students’ leaders against
any thing that is Hindu’s faiths and cultures and customs are being encouraged
so as to bring disrepute to India in general and Modi in particular.
‘Bharath Matha Ki Jai and Vanthe Matharam were
not mere slogans during freedom struggle, but, they were source of strength and
sacrifice for the freedom fighters – soul moving battle cries to keep the
powder dry to win the freedom struggle. Now, in the prevailing context of
threatening Islamic Terrorism across the world, Love of one’s country and
respect and reverence to our national song and national anthem are all the need
of the hour and any dissenting voices are real danger to our country.
Think India Think.
Comments