Hinduismphobia Vs Islamophobia by Pavithran



Hindus can call only India as their home land and they had never desired to expand their land by waging wars against any country therefor, as Muslims, British, French , Portuguese  had done by infiltrations and forceful occupations of our Indian territories by their expansion policies. Along with these treacherous maneuvers to rule pockets of land in India, these invaders had started forceful conversions of local Hindu populations with lures and punishments and these people were the originators of Hinduismphobia – many had fall victims to their tortures and also embraced their religions – Islam or Christianity.  

If a few staunch Hindu Patriots raised objections for such  forceful conversions then, these Hindus Brethren were labeled as ‘Islamophia’ or ‘Christianmophia’!

Unfortunately, such wrong labeling is still in vogue even after India attained full Independence from such foreign rulers. Under the wrong strategy of Secularism, the Hindus are still marginalized and the appeasement Vote Bank politics is religiously practiced by  all political parties except Shiv Sena and BJP. The same invaders’ mindset are still reining in the minds of Foreign Press and even Local English Indian Press. 

Hence it is not unexpected that Washington Post termed the elevation of Yogi Adityanath as the Militant Monk spreading Islamophobia!

It is quite unfortunate that renowned Advocate Fali S. Nariman – a Parsi by religion, had commented that Yogi’s elevation to CM of UP – being a monk, is a threat to the constitution. While Iran Muslims had driven Parsis from Iran, they were allowed to settle at Gujarat by  Jadi Rana, a Hindu King at Udvada. Though initially Jadi Rana motioned to a vessel of milk filled to the very brim to signify that his kingdom was already full and could not accept refugees, the intelligent Parsi Priest added a pinch of sugar to the milk, thus indicating that they would not bring the vessel to overflowing and indeed make the lives of the local citizens sweeter.  Parsi refugees were accommodated at Udvada in Gujarat.  

Yogi and Modi had great respects for Parsis and their patriotism towards India. Hence, Nariman’s outbursts about Yogi are quite uncharitable and unethical and unconstitutional.

Due to secularism as practiced by India so long, all major Hindus’ Temples are being taken over by the respective local governments and the temple funds  have become that of governments. But, neither Mosques or Churches were taken over. 

Believe me, Muslims were given Haj Subsidies from long by the Governments – though their religious funds were untouched – special benefits under the guise of secularism.   Only recently, Hindus got subsidy for Amarnath Yathra.

Is this not anti-Hinduism? Yes, the Hindus had awakened, but, alas, Sicularists and Liberals and Leftists are saddened! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gandhi Recited Quran Verses in the Temple of Valmiki Basti near Delhi

Carnatic Musicians Aiding for Christian Conversion Efforts – Courtesy: Naithrupan

2024 LOK SABHA ELECTION – TO WHOM TO VOTE AND WHY