ARNAB ARREST & SUPREME COURT ANGER AND ADMONITIONS

 

TO     MAKE     NATION     KNOW     -     SUPREME     COURT"S      HISTORIC   VIEWS
 

Don’t know how far the following forward is valid, but makes interesting reading.

Anvay NaikCompany at loss in-2013: 8.21cr; in 2014: 4.74 cr; In 2016: 4.45 cr.

Total debt 19.57 cr, overdraft 10.37, trade receivables 6.63, trade payables 7.51.

But Dues fromArnab: 83 lac; Feroz Shaikh: 4 cr; Neetish Sarda: 55 lac.

He and his mother, director of his company were found dead. But the death note was signed only by him.

In Death note he asked Arnab, Firoz Shaikh and Neetish Sarda to repay his creditors.(pertinent to note he did not mention that since these 3 did not pay his dues he is committing suicide.)

He mentioned that he and his mother mutually took the decision. Where are the other two?- Why no channel is mentioning the names of other two?- Why are they not arrested?-what was the reason of death of his mother Kumud?

After proper CID investigation, when the court had stamped the closure report of this case (2019), then why all this gimmick is being done now?

Anvay Naik was the owner of Concorde Designs Private Limited (CDPL), which was incorporated in 2002 and was involved in the manufacture of furniture. Kumud (Anvay's mother) and Anvay Naik were directors of the company. Its registered office is at Dadar east. 

The CDPL company declared a loss of ₹4.45 crore for fiscal 2016, Concorde Designs has a total debt of ₹19.57 crore and a bank overdraft of ₹10.37 crore.

The total trade receivables of the company for fiscal 2016 was Rs 6.63 crore, while the trade payables were Rs 7.51 crore.

According to the financial statements, the company made losses of Rs 8.21 crore and Rs 4.74 crore in fiscal 2014 & 2013 respectively.

Two more names were there on that SUICIDE note, Feroz Shaikh and Niteish Sarda, what happened to them ?

90% payment was done by ARG Outlier of RepublicTV to CONCORDE DESIGNS PRIVATE LIMITED (Anvay Naik) over 2 years ago, do you think for 10% he will commit suicide ?

NO contractor commits suicide for the last 10% ? Doubtful.

The real culprit is Feroz Shaikh (Owner of IcastX/Skimedia), who did not give ₹4 cr of Anvay Naik, which is actually a Huge amount, why NO action was taken by Parambir police ?

Why Mrs Akshata Naik is fabricating the facts ? Why now ? Why you people kept your mouth shut for 2 years ?

We also need JusticeForAnvayNaik but the real culprits must be punished not the one who already paid 90% of the amount & got a "clean chit" from court.

 Republic TV Arnab Goswami – His Bail and Alleged Sharing of Confidential Records of Maharasthra Assembly by Pavithran

There  were two cases under which Arnab was booked:

1.   2018 Suicide Case of Anvay Naik, Architect to whom Arnab owed Rs.83 lacs the details are as below:

Arnab Goswami was arrested on November 4, 2020 after Maharashtra government had reopened a 2018 abatement of the suicide case of an architect, Anvay Naik. In his suicide note, the architect has blamed a few people, including Arnab Goswami, for not paying dues. Later, the court had closed the case after the Raigad police filed a closure report, but it was reopened in May 2020 by the Maharashtra government. (For more details please read the article on the previous pages).

2. Arnab Goswami had approached the Supreme Court challenging the  privilege motion sent to him by the Maharashtra Assembly for his criticism of government inaction in the Sushant Singh Rajput suicide case.

Arnab was served a 60 page privilege notice by  Athawale, Assistant Secretary of the Maharashtra Vidhan Mandal Sachivalaya on October 13, 2020 for sharing the minutes of proceedings sent to him by the Speaker and the Privileges Committee of the Maharastra Legislative Assembly to the Supreme Court, while seeking a bail in the case. These proceedings were in relation to the breach of privilege motion initiated against Arnab Goswami.

While the first case was heard by a supreme court bench comprising of Justice Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra, the second one was by a Bench of Chief Justice of India SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian.

Both the benches took strong objections for the ways in which Mahastra Government, its Police, its Assembly apart from the Bombay High Court had failed in their solemn duty to uphold the freedom of individuals.

Let us take the first case.

The following remarks of the Supreme Court judges are historic and are golden words to be remembered by all stake holders – governments, judiciaries and legislators.

1. Bombay High Court made an error in rejecting the application for grant of interim bail to Arnab Goswami on technical grounds.

2. The Bombay High Court abdicated its constitutional duty as protector of liberty by failing to take prima facie view of the FIR. The criminal law should not become a tool for selective harassment of citizens. The remedy of bail is a solemn expression of humaneness in the justice system. We have given expression to our anguish in the case where the citizen has approached the Court, but denied bail.  The figures of the National Judicial Data Grid regarding the number of bail applications which are pending, should be utilsed by every High Court to  ensure equitable access to justice. Liberty is not a gift for the few.

3. If money is owed to a person, is that a case of Abetment to suicide? Assuming the FIR is the gospel truth and that's a matter of investigation but is not paying up money Abetment to suicide? It will be a Travesty of justice if bail is not granted while FIR is pending? 

4. There was a rule established by Justice Krishna Iyer which was “bail is rule and jail is exception.” High Courts get burdened. Chances of incarceration are huge and the accused languishes as undertrial.

5 Travelling to the path of destruction if the court does not interfere today. Whatever be Arnab’s ideology, lest I don't even watch his channel but if in this case, constitutional courts do not interfere today - we are travelling the path of destruction undeniably.

6. If state governments target individuals, they must realise there is apex court to protect liberty of citizens. 

Now, let us jot down what the judges observed in hearing the second case of ‘privilege notice’ for sharing confidential minutes to the Supreme Court by Arnab.

1.   The Bench had observed that the letter 13^th October 2020 from the Speaker of  the Maharashtra Assembly was in the teeth of Article 32 and amounted to a threat  to prevent Goswami from moving the Supreme Court.

2.   2. CJI Bobde had said that such attempts to prevent citizens from exercising their rights under Article 32 would amount to serious interference with the administration of justice. The Secretary of the State Assembly was asked to be personally present in Court for the next hearing and explain why contempt of court action should not be initiated against him for the October 13 letter.

The 60-page privilege notice was sent to Goswami after motions were moved against him by the Shiv Sena in the both Assembly Houses in Maharashtra.

A privilege motion can be moved if an individual or authority violates or disregards any of the privileges, powers, and immunities of the House concerned or members of the House or Committee. What amounts to breach of privilege or contempt is decided by the House, which also decides the punishment.

The Bench’s observation that ‘letter to Arnab on privilege issue of sharing confidential matters to the Supreme Court’ is a contempt of court and intimidation of Arnab!

Constitution of India is supreme and any violation by any one should be dealt with severely to save freedom, liberty and safety of all individuals irrespective of power or position.

JAI HO SUPREME COURT! 

E-Touch honours these 5 Supreme Court Judges for their historic utterences which will be written in Golden Letters in the Law Journals and Law Books – with a bouquet.