US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION

 



Readers may object to my calling US Presidential Election Processes using some strong adjectives such as ‘confused, contradictory, contentious.’ I concede that US Electoral System is the oldest democratic system in the world, while Indian Electoral System is the largest democratic system in the world.

Compared to US De-centralized Electoral System, India’s Centralized System under one Apex Body called – ‘Election Commission of India – completely independent body created under the Constituent of India to conduct all elections for Lok Sabha, State Assemblies, Rajya Sabha, the President, Vice-President down to Panchayat Elections – mostly through Electronic Voting Machines. This was hailed as the most efficient and successful election processes by the world at large.

Then, one may ask – Why the US was using Paper Ballots – that too not uniform but every States had their own methods of printing ballot papers, postal votings etc. instead of a centralized Mechanical Voting Systems under one independent autonomous apex body as prevalent in India ?

In one word, the answer is “Federalism” which, US believes, is more vital to preserve freedom in a democratic set up for a long time till to-day.

But, it is a fact that Concept of Federalism had in some elections become a setback, as a candidate who received less than a majority of the popular vote was elected as the President, while the losing candidate secured a majority of the popular vote – all due to the faulty system of Electoral College.

Yet movements for electoral reform, including proposals for a straightforward nationwide direct election by popular vote, have gained little traction.

Supporters of the current system defend it as a manifestation of federalism, arguing that it also guards against the chaos inherent in a multiparty environment by encouraging the current two-party system. Critics, on the other hand, charge that the current system negates the one-person, one-vote basis of U.S. elections, subverts majority rule, works against political participation in states deemed safe for one party, and might lead to chaos should an elector desert a candidate, thus thwarting the popular will.

In the 2000 presidential election, George W. Bush received fewer popular votes than Albert Gore Jr., but received a majority of electoral votes, and the 2016 election, where Donald J. Trump received fewer popular votes than Hillary Clinton, but received a majority of electoral votes.

 

Florida State Electorates of 25 had gone to Bush thereby giving him a victory in the presidential election. Gore received 48.4 percent popular votes as against Bush receiving only 47.9 popular votes, losing by over 540,000 votes, but still Al Gore with only 250 electorates as against Bush’s  271 due to Florida 25 electorates gained by Bush made Bush a victor in the presidential election!


Again in 2016, even though millions more individuals voted for the Democratic candidate than the Republican candidate in CA, PA, and TX (if you add the votes from the 3 States), the Democratic Party was only awarded the electors appointed in CA. Because the Republican candidate won the State popular vote in PA and TX, the Republican Party was awarded 3 more total electors than the Democratic Party.

(Total - 15,658,117 Democratic votes cast vs 12,139,590 Republican votes cast for the national popular vote, but 55 Democratic electors vs 58 Republican electors)

There are many such lacunae in the US Electoral System which will be dealt with in this editorial essay.

Now let me walk through the various pit falls as I see on reviewing the present US Election Processes.

First let me take the symbols of two parties – the Republic and Democratic. Elephant is the symbol of the Republic, while Donkey is the symbol of the Democratic.

Red is the color of the Republic and Blue is that of Democratic.

Here are their symbols:



But in their party symbols, they have both blue and red – but more red and less blue for Republic and vice versa. If you ask – Why this?, they will say our US flag have blue and red colors and our parties should respect our flag by having both colours.

In the early 20th century, the traditional symbol of the Democratic Party in Indiana, Kentucky, Oklahoma and Ohio was the rooster, as opposed to the Republican eagle. This symbol still appears on Oklahoma, Kentucky, Indiana, and West Virginia ballots. The rooster was adopted as the official symbol of the national Democratic Party. In New York, the Democratic ballot symbol is a five-pointed star and not rooster!




Donkey Symbol, it was revealed, is only semi-official. The new logo, which featured a blue D inside a blue circle was the party’s first official logo. 





But there were no uniformity in ballot papers – size, manner of marking ballot papers, etc.  Even printing of ballot papers were the job of respective States who conduct the election and hence on the concept of federalism, they were following their own set of rules. 

Similarly Republic Party has ‘Grand Old Party’ Symbol in the red back ground. 


In Some States Ballot Papers run into 4 to 5 pages and it is strange that how the voters had not raised any objections for such a procedure. This happened because the president/vice-president elections were clubbed with elections of House representatives, Governors, Local Bodies etc.

Anyhow, there are no national standards for ballot forms, but federal law does require that administrators provide ballots in multiple languages when a percentage of the population in their jurisdiction does not speak English as a primary language.

Some states have replaced paper ballots with voting machines and other types of voting, as Elections in the United States are administered at the state and local level, and the federal government does not set mandatory standards for voting technologies.

·         1. Paper Ballots

·         2. Lever Machines

·         3. Punchcards

·         4. Computer (push-buttons)

·         5. Marksense Forms

·         6. Electronic Voting

Though some states have passed laws that require government issued identification or eliminate registration on Election Day, some states still allow voters to register on Election Day.

Several States have adopted procedures that make ballots available to voters before the election. This trend started with provisions for absentee ballots, issued to voters who anticipate being away from their home (and their voting place) on Election Day. Some states and local jurisdictions gradually liberalized this provision, allowing citizens to register as ‘permanent absentee voters’ and routinely have a ballot mailed to their home.

Two States – Oregon and Washington – conduct their elections entirely by mail. Absentee voters generally return their completed ballots by mail. Some states now allow citizens to vote up to three week before Election Day using voting machines in shopping malls and other public places.

Some of the diverse practices that seem odd to Indians who are used to a giant, meticulously operated and centrally controlled system, are indicative of the options available to the American voter, and reflect the implicit trust that is placed in the voter.

Take the case of the postal ballot system. In India, postal ballot is not a matter of choice that the voter can exercise, except in the case of the facility being now made available to senior citizens. The defense personnel or some other categories of voters engaged in essential services are categorized as a separate class of voters who are entitled to this facility.

In US it is offered as a choice to the voter. In India, there is a strong argument against postal ballots on account of the possible influence others may exercise on the voter and the concern relating to secrecy of voting. It is on account of this that the facility of ballot paper voting when allowed to senior citizens was implemented by a team of polling personnel physically delivering the ballot to the voter and collecting it on the spot after it had been cast. If the ballots were posted to such voters, there was neither an assurance that the ballot paper would be received by the voter concerned and that he or she would exercise her right without being influenced by interested parties.

There are two more important major issues to be dealt with –

viz. 1. Procedures adopted by Political Parties in nominating their presidential candidates

and

2. Composition, Duties and Responsibilities of Electoral College.

1. Procedures adopted by political parties to nominate their presidential candidates are through primaries and caucuses.

Primaries and caucuses

 

Each of the 50 US states has its own Democrat and Republican leaders. In some states, this leadership is represented by groups known as a 'caucus'. At the time of the declaration of the next presidential election, candidates who wish to put their hat in the ring must first win their party's nomination.

 

For this purpose, the candidates are required to campaign across the United States and convince the members of their respective party to vote for them in the primaries (contest to decide who wins the nomination).

 

State party members who vote in favour of a particular candidate are counted as that candidate's delegates.

The modern nominating process of U.S. presidential elections consists of two major parts:

1. a series of presidential primary elections and caucuses held in each state,

2. the presidential nominating conventions held by each political party.

This process was never included in the Constitution, and thus evolved over time by the political parties to clear the field of candidates.

The primary elections are run by state and local governments, while the caucuses are organized directly by the political parties.

 Some states hold only primary elections, some hold only caucuses, and others use a combination of both. These primaries and caucuses are staggered generally between January and June before the federal election, with Iowa and New Hampshire traditionally holding the first presidential state caucus and primary, respectively.

Like the general election, presidential caucuses or primaries are indirect elections.

The major political parties officially vote for their presidential candidate at their respective nominating conventions, usually all held in the summer before the federal election.

Depending on each state's law and state's political party rules, when voters cast ballots for a candidate in a presidential caucus or primary, they may be voting to award delegates "bound" to vote for a candidate at the presidential nominating conventions, or they may simply be expressing an opinion that the state party is not bound to follow in selecting delegates to their respective national convention.

Unlike the general election, voters in the U.S. territories can also elect delegates to the national conventions.

Furthermore, each political party can determine how many delegates to allocate to each state and territory.

Presidential Candidates are selected through either by Primary or Caucus.  Though these are purely political in nature, it is the norm that State and Local Governments determine the dates on which primary elections or caucuses are held. For Indian Voters, it may be unethical and unwarranted.

To become the presidential nominee, a candidate typically has to win a majority of delegates. This usually happens through the party’s 

Primaries and caucuses. It’s then confirmed through a vote of

the delegates at the national convention. In general, primaries use secret ballots for voting. Caucuses are local gatherings of voters who vote at the end of the meeting for a particular candidate.

But if no candidate gets the majority of a party’s delegates during the primaries and caucuses, convention delegates choose the nominee. This happens through additional rounds of voting.

 

Both primaries and caucuses can be “open,” “closed,” or some hybrid of the two.

o    During an open primary or caucus, people can vote for a candidate of any political party.

o    During a closed primary or caucus, only voters registered with that party can take part and vote.

o    “Semi-open” and “semi-closed” primaries and caucuses are variations of the two main types.

 

 

Example:

§  closed / semi-closed primaries (e.g. Arizona)

·       open primaries (e.g. Missouri)

·       blanket primaries (e.g. Lousiana)

In the party, there are two main types of delegates viz. Pledged, or Bound delegates and Unpledged or Super Delegates. They must support the candidates of their respective presidential candidates, but, Super Delegates are free to support any presidential candidate they choose.

In rare cases, if none of the party’s candidates has a majority of delegates going into the convention, the convention is considered “contested” or “brokered”.

Delegates will then pick their presidential nominee through one or more rounds of voting. 

·         In the first round of voting, pledged delegates usually have to vote for the candidate they were awarded to at the start of the convention. Unpledged delegates don't.

·         Super delegates can't vote in the first round unless a candidate already has enough delegates through primaries and caucuses to get the nomination.

·         If no nominee wins in the first round, the convention is considered “brokered.” The pledged delegates may choose any candidate in later rounds of voting. Super delegates can vote in these later rounds.

Balloting continues until one candidate receives the required majority to win the nomination.

Hence, In a Caucus: Party members select the best candidate through a series of discussions and votes. In a Primary: Party members vote for the best candidate that will represent them in the general election.

At the convention, the presidential nominee officially announces their selection of a vice presidential running mate.

In 2012 for example, the Democratic and Republican Party conventions each used two different formulas to allocate delegates.

The Democrats-based theirs on two main factors: the proportion of votes each state gave to the Democratic candidate in the previous three presidential elections, and the number of electoral votes each state had in the Electoral College.

In contrast, the Republicans assigned to each state 10 delegates, plus three delegates per congressional district. Both parties then gave a fixed number of delegates to each territory, and finally bonus delegates to states and territories that passed certain criteria.

Along with delegates chosen during primaries and caucuses, state and U.S. territory delegations to both the Democratic and Republican Party conventions also include "unpledged" delegates who have a vote.

For Republicans, they consist of the three top party officials from each state and territory. Democrats have a more expansive group of unpledged delegates called "super delegates", who are party leaders and elected officials.

Each party's presidential candidate also chooses a vice presidential nominee to run with him or her on the same ticket, and this choice is rubber-stamped by the convention.

The conventions have historically been held inside convention centers, but since the late 20th century both the Democratic and Republican parties have favored sports arenas and domed stadiums to accommodate the increasing attendance.

 National Conventions : Each party holds a national convention to select a final presidential nominee.

 State delegates from the primaries and caucuses selected to represent the people will now “endorse” their favorite candidates and the final presidential nominee from each party will be officially announced at the end of the conventions.

Hence, Conventions finalize a party’s choice for presidential and vice presidential nominees.

In the 2020 presidential election, only Iowa, Nevada, North Dakota, Wyoming and a handful of U.S. territories will hold caucuses.

The nominated presidential candidates then campaign across the country to explain their views and plans to voters. They may also participate in debates with candidates from other parties.

2. Composition, Duties and Responsibilities of Electoral College.

 Geographically US consists of 50 States and Districts of Washington DC with 3 electors which elects their members of House of Representatives to form Electoral College. This forum is called Lower House of Congress. Numbers of House Representatives of each State are decided by the population of respective states which will be updated every 10 years. That means that as the tenure of President/Vice-President is restricted to 4 years terms, the revision takes place after every two presidential elections. The term of Lower House Member is for 2 years and hence, at the time of every presidential election, new Lower House Members will also be elected directly by the voters along with president and vice-president.

Apart from Lower House, Electoral College has Upper House with Senate Members having 6 years term being elected every 4 years.

 

As every State will have 2 Senators each, total Senators for the Electoral College will be 100 i.e. 50 x 2 = 100. Every four years 1/3 of 100 i.e. 33 Senators will retire and third lot will be 34 senators for retirement. It should be noted that each of the 50 states have been allotted 2 seats each in the upper house of the Congress, no matter how big or small the population is. This allotment is different from number of seats allotted to Lower House on the basis of population census.

 Elections for Lower House and Upper House will be held in even years.

Hence in 2020 US election, number of Lower House Members for each State had undergone changes from the last census of  2010. 

At present, Electoral College has 538 total members of Congress – 435 Lower House Electoral Members from States plus 3 Lowers House Electoral Members from Washington DC and 100 Upper House Senators – Total 435 + 3 + 100 = 538. Therefore, the magic majority mark is 270 votes of electors of Electoral College to get elected as the President of US.

The number of voting representatives is fixed by law at 435. In addition, there are currently six non-voting members, bringing the total membership of the US House of Representatives to 441 or fewer with vacancies. As of the 2020 Census, the largest delegation is that of California, with 55 representatives. Seven states have only one representative: Alaska, Delaware, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Under Article I, Section 2 of the Constitution, seats in the House of Representatives are apportioned among the states by population, as determined by the census conducted every ten years. Each state is entitled to at least one representative, however small its population.

The constitutional rule relating to the size of the House states:

"The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative."

Congress regularly increased the size of the House to account for population growth until it fixed the number of voting House members at 435 in 1911. In 1959, upon the admission of Alaska and Hawaii, the number was temporarily increased to 437 (seating one representative from each of those states without changing existing apportionment), and returned to 435 four years later, after the reapportionment consequent to the 1960 census.

The Constitution does not provide for the representation of the District of Columbia or of territories. The District of Columbia and the territories of Puerto Rico, American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are each represented by one non-voting delegate.

In fine, along with Presidential Elections, all 438 seats in the House of Representatives, the full terms for 33 or 34 of the 100 seats in the Senate, the Governorships of several States and many state and local elections are held simultaneously making the paper ballot cumbersome and lengthy.

While Lower House and Upper House Members and others are elected directly by popular vote, the president and vice-president are not elected directly by citizens. Instead they are chosen by ‘Electors’ through process called the Electoral College.

The United States House of Representatives is the lower house of the United States Congress, with the Senate being the upper house. Together they compose the national bicameral legislature of the United States.

Now let us deal with two situations –

 (1) where the president elected by the Electors got less popular votes than the losing candidate

and

(2) when no one crossed the majority votes of 270.

 

1. Winning the Popular Vote but Losing the Election

A candidate needs the vote of at least 270 electors—more than half of all electors—to win the presidential election.

Most of the time, the winner of a US presidential election also wins the national popular vote. It is possible to win the Electoral College but lose the popular vote.  This happened in 1876, 1888, 2000, and 2016 and were all losses of three percentage points or less.

It is important to remember that the President is not chosen by a national popular vote. The Electoral College vote totals determine the winner, not the statistical plurality or majority a candidate may have in the national popular vote totals. Electoral votes are awarded on the basis of the popular vote in each state.

For example, all 55 of California’s electoral votes go to the winner of the state election, even if the margin of victory is only 50.1 percent to 49.9 percent.

In most cases, a projected winner is announced on election night in November after public vote. But the actual Electoral College vote takes place in mid-December when the electors meet in their states.

 

2. What Happens if No Candidate Wins the Majority of Electoral Votes?

If no candidate receives the majority of electoral votes, the vote goes to the House of Representatives. House members choose the new president from among the top three candidates. The Senate elects the vice president from the remaining top two candidates.

This has only happened once. In 1824, the House of Representatives elected John Quincy Adams as president.

 If no candidate receives an absolute majority of the votes for president, the House of Representatives elects the president; likewise if no one receives an absolute majority of the votes for vice president, then the Senate elects the vice president.

Since local governments are responsible for managing elections, these races typically all appear on one ballot. The Electoral College electors then formally cast their electoral votes on the first Monday after December 12 at their state's capital.

Congress then certifies the results in early January, and the presidential term begins on Inauguration Day, which since the passage of the Twentieth Amendment has been set at January 20.

 In Electoral College results of the 2016 U.S. presidential electionRepublican Donald Trump won the popular vote in 30 states (red) and in Maine's 2nd congressional district to capture 306 electoral votes. Democrat Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in 20 states (blue) plus D.C. to capture 232 electoral votes. Of these, seven were cast by faithless electors—two pledged to Trump and five pledged to Clinton—for other persons.

Most state laws establish a winner-take-all system, wherein the ticket that wins a plurality of votes wins all of that state's allocated electoral votes, and thus has their slate of electors chosen to vote in the Electoral College. 

Maine and Nebraska do not use this method, instead giving two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one electoral vote to the winner of each Congressional district.

Each state's winning slate of electors then meets at their respective state's capital on the first Monday after the second Wednesday in December to cast their electoral votes on separate ballots for president and vice president.

In early January, the total Electoral College vote count is opened by the sitting vice president, acting in his capacity as President of the Senate, and read aloud to a joint session of the incoming Congress, which was elected at the same time as the President.

If no candidate receives a majority of the electoral vote (at least 270), the President is determined by the rules outlined by the Twelfth Amendment.

Specifically, the selection of President would then be decided by a contingent election in a ballot of the House of Representatives.

For the purposes of electing the President, each state has only one vote.

A ballot of the Senate is held to choose the Vice President. In this ballot, each senator has one vote.

The House has chosen the victor of the presidential race only twice, in 1800 and 1824;

The Senate has chosen the victor of the vice-presidential race only once, in 1836.

Another problem may arise if Some Electors become ‘Faithless Electors’ i.e. casting their electoral votes against the person whom they have pledged to vote.

Although Electoral College members can vote for anyone under the U.S. Constitution, 33 states plus the District of Columbia have laws against faithless electors, those electors who do not cast their electoral votes for the person for whom they have pledged to vote.

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in the case Chiafalo v. Washington on July 6, 2020 that the constitution does not prevent states from penalizing or replacing faithless electors.

However, not all states have such laws on the books. Among the closely contested states in 2020, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin are among the states without faithless elector laws.

Also under federal law, a joint session of Congress is required by the 12th Amendment to count the electoral votes and declare the winners of the presidential election. That joint session of Congress is held on January 6, 2021 at 1 p.m.

 

The Federal Election Commission (FEC) is an independent regulatory agency of the United States whose purpose is to enforce campaign finance law in United States federal elections. The objective of the commission is “Protecting the integrity of the campaign finance process”.

The commission has not functioned since late August 2019, with an exception for the period of May 2020 to July 2020, due to lack of a quorum. In the absence of a quorum, the commission cannot vote on complaints or give guidance through advisory opinions.

As of May 19, 2020, there were 350 outstanding matters on the agency's enforcement docket and 227 items waiting for action. To complete steps necessary to resolve a complaint – including time for defendants to respond to the complaint, time to investigate and engage in legal analysis, and finally, where warranted, prosecution – necessarily takes far longer than the comparatively brief period of a political campaign.

Critics of the FEC have harshly complained of the FEC's impotence, and accused it of succumbing to regulatory capture where it serves the interests of the ones it was intended to regulate.

The FEC's bipartisan structure, which was established by Congress, renders the agency "toothless." Critics also claim that most FEC penalties for violating election law come well after the actual election in which they were committed.

CONCLUSION:

Hence US Elections had many loopholes that need to be plugged to be voter friendly and also to represent the popular voters’ choices allowing electing the President and Vice President directly instead of through indirect mechanism of Electoral College.

Let me quote some of the criticism about the present US Election system:

 v US Electoral College System is stupid and immoral.

v The Electoral College is archaic and inherently undemocratic.

 Some of the suggestions mooted to cleanse the US Electoral System are also noted here.

ü Every Vote Counts Amendment, have been proposed seeking to replace the Electoral College with a direct popular vote, which proponents argue would increase turnout and participation.

ü National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, an interstate compact without Congressional authorization, suggest that individual participating states agree to allocate their electors based on the winner of the national popular vote, instead of voting their respective statewide results.

ü Another proposal is for every state to simply adopt the District system used by Maine and Nebraska: give two electoral votes to the statewide winner and one electoral vote to the winner of each Congressional district.

ü The Automatic Plan would replace the Electors with an automatic tallying of votes to eliminate the faithless elector affecting the outcome of the election.

In the concept of Federalism, Individual’s Voting Choice should overweigh all other factors and doubting the wisdom of individual voters in choosing directly its President and Vice President is against the solemn concept and policy of freedom itself. Fear of Multi – Party System should not create a stumbling block to amend the constitution to give way for direct election of the President and Vice-President and introduction of Electronic Voting Machines.

HOPE THAT MY OBSERVATIONS THAT US PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION – MOST CONFUSED, CONTRADICTORY, CONTENTIOUS PROCESSES   WERE BASED ON VALID AND SOLID REASONS AND ANALYSIS.     

 

SATYAMEVA       JAYATHE


Annexures












































Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Gandhi Recited Quran Verses in the Temple of Valmiki Basti near Delhi

Carnatic Musicians Aiding for Christian Conversion Efforts – Courtesy: Naithrupan

The Grammar of Anarchy by Dr. B.R.Ambedkar